Looking for methodological innovations in qualitative research – analyses of geography graduates’ transition to the labour market

Authors

  • Danuta Piróg Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie Instytut Geografii Zakład Dydaktyki Geografii

Keywords:

geography graduate, qualitative survey, semantic field method, transition

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to propose using the adopted and partly modified semantic field method for the analysis and interpretation of longer answers for open questions in social geography and educational surveys. The article consists of both the classic semantic field method description and the scope of its modification done for surveying geography graduates’ transition to the labour market. It also presents some results of this transition process which would not be possible to identify without using the modified semantic field method during the analysis of the collected material. The modified semantic field method, apart from transforming qualitative material into quantitative data, allows for a methodologically explained, clear, easy process of analysing, as well as concluding and formulating rules devoted to quantitative spheres of the problem. Benefits of using both the classic and modified semantic field method seem to encourage scientists to use it in educational studies and surveys. The most suitable topics for using the method in educational studies are those devoted to the effectiveness, quality and satisfaction.

References

Allen, J., van der Velden, R. (2007). Transition from higher education to work. In: U. Teichler (Ed.), Careers of university graduates: Views and experiences in comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, 55–78.

Doroszewicz, S. (2011). Metodyka badania jakości kształcenia w szkolnictwie wyższym w Polsce. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.

Encyklopedia Powszechna. (2002). T. VI. Kraków: Wyd. Kluszczyński.

Kapila, S., Lyon, F. (2006). Expedition field techniques. People oriented research. London: Royal Geography Society.

Konecki, K. (2000). Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana. Warszawa: PWN.

Konecki, K., Ślęzak, I. (2012). Socjologia jakościowa – innowacyjne metody w badaniach jakościowych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 8(1), 6–10.

Mayntz, R., Holm, K., Hübner, P. (1985). Wprowadzenie do metod socjologii empirycznej. Warszawa: PWN.

Pilch, T. (1995). Zasady badań pedagogicznych. Warszawa: Wyd. Żak.

Piróg, D. (2010). Sondaż diagnostyczny w badaniach z zakresu dydaktyki geografii – wybrane determinanty responsywności. W: S. Liszewski (red.), Obszary metropolitarne we współczesnym środowisku geograficznym. Łódź: UŁ, 415–425.

Robin, R. (1980). Badanie pól semantycznych: doświadczenia Ośrodka Leksykologii Politycznej w Saint-Cloud. W: M. Głowiński (red.), Język i społeczeństwo. Warszawa: Czytelnik, 205–282.

Salas-Valasco, M. (2007). The transition from higher education to employment in Europe: the analysis of time to obtain the first job. Higher Education, 54(3), 333–360.

Schomburg, H., Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2006). Higher education and graduate employment in Europe. Results from graduate surveys from twelve countries. Higher education dynamics, 15.

Travers, M. (2009). New methods, old problems: Ascetical view of innovation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 161–179.

Wiles, R., Crow, G., Pain, H. (2011). Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 587–604.

Wyka, A. (1993). Badacz społeczny wobec doświadczenia. Warszawa: Wyd. Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.

Published

2014-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles